I have an OBC logic breakout harness installed; therefore, I have easy access to a CP test point.
I had my 'scope with me, but swapping between the three EVSEs showed that it's more likely an EVSE issue than a car issue, and I ran out of daylight anyway. I'll be going back to the car today, and stopping at the dealership for more underbody panel push pins on my way. You always lose or break few every time they're touched
---
The narration in your video above has me scratching my head.
@0:24 it says:
"Once the circuit is closed, the EV can request a charging state by setting a resistor between the PP and PE wires."
That does not correspond to my interpretation of the
signalling description at Wikipedia J1772, and esp. with the simplified schematic there:
On the EVSE side, the PP circuit (switch + two resistors)* is contained entirely within the nozzle, and does not interface with the rest of the EVSE at all. It does not signal a request by the EV, rather it assures the EV that there is a nozzle inserted, so the EV knows to not allow drive-away. Additionally, S3 signals imminent nozzle removal, signalling the EV to expect nozzle disengagment, and that the EV should discontinue current flow (reduces sliding contact wear, creates a safe disconnect status).
I suspect the narration was formed from a typo in the script, and that sentence should refer to CP, rather than PP.
* = The circuit shown above is for the CCS1 (primarily North America) implementation of J1772; I marked up and added info for the CCS2 version
here sometime in 2022:
The PP circuit resistances in the CCS2 world include provision for untethered EVSE cables of varying current capacities, as noted in
the PP section of the Wikipedia article. Genearlly, NA EVSEs have tethered/captive charge cables and don't need to implement the multiple-resistance scheme that is seen in other parts of the world, where the EV owner is expected to carry their own J1772 charging cable to the EVSE.