I just reread the eligibility requirements and spotted a potential issue for myself and possibly others here. If you're on PG&E's E-9 rate plan (either A or B), that may disqualify you as a participant in this program. Apparently, to be eligible, you should NOT already be on a "special EV" TOU rate plan like E-9A/B or EV-A/B . . .
"According to advice letter 4458-E, the qualifying PG&E rate schedules for residential customers are E-1, E-6, E-7, EM and ES or their low-income equivalents. PG&E customers on E-9 could switch to an eligible rate schedule or wait until the end of the year, and try to enroll in the pilot in January, if there were any remaining slots."
In my case, two of those other rate plans would be more favorable to me as E-9A, plus I have solar. E-7 looks like it would be the best (lowest cost) plan for me to be in for qualification purposes.
I just did a comparison using the Nidili iPhone app, PG&E Toolkit. For the period starting April 1st to date, with my 4.25kW PV system operating almost continuously during that same period, the results of comparing all possible rate plans, are as follows:
Energy Used / [Generated]: [1019.11 kWh]
Number of Days: 557
Baseline Quantity: 6516.90 kWh
E-1 Cost / [Credit]: [$134.83]
E-6 Cost / [Credit]: [$504.51]
E-7 Cost / [Credit]: [$640.71]
E-9A Cost/[Credit]: [$469.28]
E-9B Cost/[Credit]: [$436.24]
EV-A Cost/[Credit]: [$784.36]
EV-B Cost/[Credit]: [$769.35]
This comparison also points out that if accepted into this pilot submetering program, and I thereby switch to EV-B, I should REALLY benefit. I have nothing to lose, and everything to gain, since CPUC has is already planning to terminate E-9A (and B) sometime in the near future.
Comments?