cipolz said:Hi there
Would you mind sharing your berkeley salesman?
I am looking to get one this week.
Thanks!
cipolz said:I forgot.
I tried Hanlees as well, and although their True price was the best, they would not do the unlimited mileage lease.
Go figure...
If the vehicle is totaled your insurance pays off the lease (not you) and you are done. The more you put down the more you lose. Besides it is virtually 0% lease so no reason to put anything down as there is no savings.worldly1 said:Just beginning to look into leasing one and shipping it N. to Seattle and am very thankful to have found this forum. Can someone please post a link or re-post the info. about why one should not do a lease with "money down"? I've been going thru older posts, but not finding the specifics on that point. Cheers!
worldly1 said:I've been seeing posts related to the amount put down, the "drive-off cost", being taxed, somehow. My question is this: I see that everyone here is striving for the $0 down lease. Why is that, versus the money down lease?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that's exactly what "lease gap coverage" is supposed to take care of. It costs a couple dollars a month, and covers the difference between what the car is worth, and what Toyota will ask you for if the car is totaled. Dianne said we should not technically have to worry about this when putting very little down, since the lease obligation should be much less than the book value on the car, but it's a small price to pay just to be sure. I'm still a bit fuzzy on the whole thing so anyone else who knows more please feel free to chime in.TonyWilliams said:Here's an extreme example. You lease a car and pay the entire lease up front (yes, this actually happens). Then you drive off the lot and and a truck plows into it, and subsequently the insurance company writes it off as a "total loss".
Can you see whatt happened to your money? You never owned the car, so you see absolutley zero insurance money from the total loss.
Enter your email address to join: