Qwk, you seem to like to explain away or give excuses as to why it seems Teslas aren't very reliable or should be given a "free pass".
qwk said:
You are taking a few cases out of many and assigning reliability based on that? Lol. The I knew of someone, who knew of someone theory doesn't hold water. Also comparing an ICE vehicle with hundreds of moving drivetrain parts to an EV that has a fraction, is silly.
Go take a look at Consumer Reliability reports year after year for Toyotas and Hondas (along w/their luxury nameplates) for every model year over every model. There are very few of them that have below average reliability and most are above average, if not much better than average. I've seen what the types of issues that reliable vehicles have.
On the other hand, before any reliability results for the Chevy Cruze came out, I saw all sorts of problems from numerous folks (e.g. transmission problems, coolant leaks and smells, improperly gapped spark plugs, speedometer spiking while the car's standing still, etc.) No surprise that when the stats came out, it was the worst vehicle in reliability in its class. The next year, it improved to average for one or both engines. But, then it deteriorated again. Seemed like a pretty good correlation to me.
When I had a 04 Nissan 350Z and saw problem reports on the 03 my350z.com (and from a coworker w/an 03), the problem spots commonly reported closely correlated w/CR's reliability reports. I personally experienced some of the issues commonly reported (e.g. axle click (was a TSB for that, service writer diagnosed it was that right in front of me), front tire inner edges feathering (was a TSB for that + alignment warranty extension w/tire replacement in some cases, I got mine front tires replaced under that + an aligment), both power window motors failing (replaced under warranty w/o issue), etc. I had some valve cover oil seepage too (fixed under warranty).
As for "comparing an ICE vehicle with hundreds of moving drivetrain parts to an EV that has a fraction, is silly." well, gee, it seems that the one w/way more moving drivetrain parts can last much longer w/o replacement.
qwk said:
Again, a leaf has a fraction of the power of the model S. Not only that, but the nissan motor is a more or less off the shelf part, while Tesla is not only designing and manufacturing theirs, they are pushing the envelope in all categories. As for the Prius, again apples to oranges, and data from a forum is a tiny sample. Do you seriously think if your leaf had a slight hum, Nissan would replace the drivetrain? You cannot be that naive.
As for Leaf having a fraction of the power, that doesn't make the motors from Tesla reliable nor is it an excuse.
There are plenty of reliable vehicles w/way more horsepower than say an econobox, yet they're still reliable.
As for "nissan motor is a more or less off the shelf part, while Tesla is not only designing and manufacturing theirs," who is supplying it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPKRTQbLs0w shows manufacturing and mentions Nissan was manufacturing them in their plant in Yokohama. I'm pretty sure they still are for JDM and other Asian market Leafs. How about now in Smryna w/trials in 2012 at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPs7FTAKTxU?
I haven't bought the paper at http://papers.sae.org/2011-01-0350/ titled "Development of High Response Motor and Inverter System for the Nissan LEAF Electric Vehicle".
qwk said:
while their automotive counterparts just stuff the same old failure prone part in, just to have it fail again.
That's a bunch of bull.
qwk said:
Nissan either blames the owner, or kicks the can down the road. That's the reason Nissan parts aren't being replaced. It certainly isn't because of a lack of failures. This should be evident for someone like yourself, who reads forums.
More bull. I've owned 1 Nissan for ~3 years, another for ~8 years and am leasing a Leaf now.
Sure there are bad dealers and service departments (as there are for all the other automakers), but your assertion is not true from my experience and what I've generally seen.
qwk said:
100 years of experience doesn't mean competence. IMO, Tesla's quality makes most other manufacturers stuff look like cheap Chinese bootleg junk(especially the US big 3).
On your 1st statement, true. Ford has horrible reliability now. On the other hand, Toyota and Honda have pretty good reliability and they've been building cars for many decades.
Tesla's quality and inexperience doesn't really give me any warm and fuzzy feelings. Sure, the Model S has great range, incredible acceleration and great handling, but it doesn't look like their reliability is great. It seems like the bits they supply to Toyota are largely responsible for the Rav4 EV's poor reliability, so far. And, we have no long-term reliability stats yet.