It looks that way so far. However, you can see that all of my winter data does not have EV usage included. I may run it again with 13kWh/day added to the months before I got my RAV to see the results. This may skew it even more toward E-9A, but if it goes into the higher tiers, it may go more toward EV-A due to the non-tiered pricing.Dsinned said:Miimura, thanks for all your contributions to this topic. So, in your particular case, similar to my situation as far as a modest size PV + two EVs, resulting in a nearly "net zero" true up NEMs balance, it looks like staying grandfathered on E-9A rates is clearly the winner. And then after December 31, 2014 switching to E-6 would probably be the best choice, correct?
New totals including August:miimura said:So I went ahead and added an equivalent Off-Peak charging amount of 13kWh/day to Jan-Apr to more accurately model the period before I got the RAV. It drastically changes the picture in the winter. Adding that usage when the solar is generating so little pushes the usage way into the upper tiers. The Tier-Less EV rate schedule then comes very close to E-9A. Adding in November and December will probably make EV-A clearly less than E-9A.
In summary:
E-1: $781.35
E-6: $578.34
E-9A: $390.02
EV-A: $399.96
These are the total amounts that would appear on my solar billing annual True-Up statement for January to July.
Edit: I forgot to change the baseline amount back to winter, so if you saw the short table without the kWh figures, the E-1, E-6, E-9A numbers are slightly lower now. Going from 11.0 to 11.7kWh/day baseline actually changed the outcome so E-9A is still less than EV-A, it was about $5 more.
If you download your SmartMeter historical data you can use my spreadsheet to add in Off-Peak charging load and recalculate your energy charges on all the relevant rate plans. If you want help with it, PM me and I'll have you send me some SmartMeter CSV data and I'll plug it in for you and send it back with whatever comparison parameters you like.dr_gibberish said:Long story short, I really cant figure out how to judge whether we will have an increase, a decrease or no real change in our bill. Anyone else have solar panels before getting an electric car? How did it affect your bill?
Yeah, my solar is really too small for our current situation. I built the house with EV charging in mind (two NEMA 14-50's in the garage), but the solar was not sized for it and would probably not even zero out the annual bill without the EV charging. That's the problem with putting solar on a new house, you don't know what you usage will actually be. Also, the orientation and shading situation is not ideal.SeaMonster said:I have a bigger solar system. 6.3KW produces 44kWh/day in summer. I generate 1.2MWh / month in summer. For me the EV-A rate is a clear winner. I also live in Marin where we created a CCA to take over power purchasing from PG&E. What that means is that I am paid a rather handsome (compared to PG&E) rate for my excess solar. Having higher peak rates and having peak on weekends and winter means my solar makes me more money. I just switched to EV-A. In the dead of winter, my bills will go up from about $13/mo to about $22/mo. But in summer I will go from making about $100/mo to making $130/mo and in April I go from making $20 to making $78.
Too bad we don't have CCA in my area. I made way too much power (even with 3 EVs) but am only getting 3+ cents per kWh back.SeaMonster said:I have a bigger solar system. 6.3KW produces 44kWh/day in summer. I generate 1.2MWh / month in summer. For me the EV-A rate is a clear winner. I also live in Marin where we created a CCA to take over power purchasing from PG&E. What that means is that I am paid a rather handsome (compared to PG&E) rate for my excess solar. Having higher peak rates and having peak on weekends and winter means my solar makes me more money. I just switched to EV-A. In the dead of winter, my bills will go up from about $13/mo to about $22/mo. But in summer I will go from making about $100/mo to making $130/mo and in April I go from making $20 to making $78.
waidy said:Too bad we don't have CCA in my area. I made way too much power (even with 3 EVs) but am only getting 3+ cents per kWh back.
srl99 said:Silicon Valley Power 10c/kWH residential no tiers or times. Alameda Power 12c. SMUD 11c up to 700kWH. Avg E-1 rate is 18c/kWH per PG&E.
It turned out that for the full year E-9A was still cheaper than EV-A in my situation. At one point, early in my analysis, I thought I might go back to E-6 when I'm kicked off E-9. According to these numbers, EV-A will be much better for my situation.miimura said:So I went ahead and added an equivalent Off-Peak charging amount of 13kWh/day to Jan-Apr to more accurately model the period before I got the RAV. It drastically changes the picture in the winter. Adding that usage when the solar is generating so little pushes the usage way into the upper tiers. The Tier-Less EV rate schedule then comes very close to E-9A. Adding in November and December will probably make EV-A clearly less than E-9A.
Enter your email address to join: