Was this a BLINK charging station by chance? Is it safe to charge a RAV4-EV at a public BLINK station? Is there any way to tell if the station has had the J1772 plug replaced, or if the station has been reprogrammed to charge at a slower rate)? I thought all BLINK units had been reprogrammed, but I recently discovered that my own BLINK (at home) will happily charge a RAV4-EV at 7KW. Will CCG still replace a defective BLINK J1772 plug? Or should I replace it myself (especially if I want to get a longer cord)?tailgate1234 said:Burnt/melted charging port from a charging station that had been recalled over a year ago but not repaired. Charging station manufacturer paid for it. Not a defect with the RAV4 EV but the problem came about because the RAV4 draws much more power than the LEAFs and Volts that charge at this particular station.
Interesting! I'm not sure anyone else has done that repair themselves and posted about it yet. If you have any other details about that process it'd be great if you could create a thread to share!ChrisMtn said:Vin #505, bought Sep '13, 21,600 mi to date. All software updates. No issues, no whining noise. I love this vehicle.
I had a burnt inlet from a defective charger (it is actually the Rema handles that are defective and not able to put out over 30A without arcing) The Charging company would not acknowledge the fault (they secretly changed out the melted handle and lowered the charge from 30A to 24A) Toyota would not replace under warranty and the dealer wanted $1800 to change the inlet. They claimed a book time of 8-12 hrs technician. They actually had no idea how the part came out. I looked, figured it out and I bought the part and changed it myself. Part was $240 (you can get them on the internet for $70) and took 30 min. 2 bolts and 2 plugs simple. These cars are not rocket science, don't let the dealers intimidate and bully you.
DevinL said:Interesting! I'm not sure anyone else has done that repair themselves and posted about it yet. If you have any other details about that process it'd be great if you could create a thread to share!
That much I figured - I'm referring more to the physical process of replacement. Having removed a decent amount of skin from my hand while installing a new horn yesterday, it's always nice to know if anyone has pointers based on their first-hand (haha) experience.TonyWilliams said:DevinL said:Interesting! I'm not sure anyone else has done that repair themselves and posted about it yet. If you have any other details about that process it'd be great if you could create a thread to share!
It's just a Yazaki inlet. Standard stuff.
evdrive said:My only complaint is that it is missing fast charging which is a stupid oversight by Toyota and Tesla.
I think if Toyota and Daimler were willing to spend the time and money doing the development to interface to the industry standard DCFCs and pay Tesla more engineering fees to do the validation testing, it would have been done. However, these are compliance cars and there was little justification to spend that money just to make the cars more popular than they need to be. In other words, I don't think it was Tesla getting in the way.tgreene said:evdrive said:My only complaint is that it is missing fast charging which is a stupid oversight by Toyota and Tesla.
Omission of fast charging could well have been part of the Toyota / Tesla deal. Tesla may not want fast charging on any of the cars for which they are providing drivetrains. I don't see it on the Mercedes EV. Fast charging might drain off a few Tesla sales, and Toyota is surely not interested in making the RAV4EV popular.
Good thing that we have Tony!
Yes, Elon has often said his goal is to help get the planet off of burning gas and he wants to see other manufacturer's develop compelling electric cars. He's not looking to protect Tesla from competitors (note release of patents and willingness to open up superchargers). And he doesn't need to protect Tesla in order for Tesla to be successful.miimura said:I think if Toyota and Daimler were willing to spend the time and money doing the development to interface to the industry standard DCFCs and pay Tesla more engineering fees to do the validation testing, it would have been done. However, these are compliance cars and there was little justification to spend that money just to make the cars more popular than they need to be. In other words, I don't think it was Tesla getting in the way.tgreene said:Omission of fast charging could well have been part of the Toyota / Tesla deal. Tesla may not want fast charging on any of the cars for which they are providing drivetrains. I don't see it on the Mercedes EV. Fast charging might drain off a few Tesla sales, and Toyota is surely not interested in making the RAV4EV popular.
Good thing that we have Tony!
Enter your email address to join: