miimura said:
This is the part that rubs me the wrong way. This is clearly coming from Toyota corporate and they're being openly hostile to customers. There is no good reason, even financial, for Toyota to tell out of state dealers they are "not allowed to touch anything" on these cars.
There is a good reason and I'd wager it is mostly financial. The Rav4 EV is a CA compliance car. Having it go beyond CA means they need to worry about training of dealer techs, regional reps as well as stocking parts outside CA.
What happens when a tech has never even seen a Rav4 EV before, or let alone been trained on one? He won't likely know how the common issues and how to fix them. And, he might have to spend WAY more time on a vehicle due to lack of experience. Guess who pays for that or eats the cost if it goes beyond standard billable amounts? What happens if they damage a part, esp. an expensive one?
What if they need to fly a rep, engineer, etc. w/experience out vs. keeping ones within the state of CA and possibly dedicated to service certain regions of CA? How much time and money will it cost (in terms of travel expenses, time spent, inability to work on other vehicles, etc.) to service a one-off vehicle that's not even sold in that state?
Look how puny the sales are overall. Then, spread out the sales all piecemeal throughout a dozen or two states and then you'll see the problem.
Of course the engineer was non-committal. He doesn't want to go against policy or promise something that he/Toyota can't deliver on.
It is too bad the way things are. Toyota isn't serious about BEVs right now and other states don't have a similar system to CA ZEV credits that incentivize or practically force large volume automakers to make BEVs (or buy ZEV credits from others).