RAV4 EV
Dimensions: 180″ L x 72″ W x 66″ H
Weight: 4,032 lb
Horse Power: 115 kW (154 hp)
Torque: 296 N·m (220 ft·lb) Normal 370 N·m (270 ft·lb) Sport
Final drive Ratio: 9.73:1?
Drag Coefficient of 0.3
0 to 60: 5.6 Sec or 7 Sec
Chevrolet Bolt
Dimensions: 164″ L x 70″ W x 63″ H
Weight: 3,580 lbs
Horse Power: 150 kW (200 hp) permanent magnet motor/generator
Torque: 266 lb.ft./360 Nm
Final drive Ratio: 7.05:1
Drag Coefficient of 0.32
0 to 60: 6.5 Sec
Differences?
Rav4 EV is...
Dimensions: 16" Longer x 2" Wider x 3" Taller
Weight: 452 Lbs Heavier
Horse Power: 46 Hp Weaker
Torque: 4 lb.ft./10 Nm Stronger
Final Drive Ratio: 2.68:1 Slower
Drag Coefficient of 0.02 Better
0 to 60: 0.5 Sec Slower
So it looks like the cards are stacked against us, but it would seem the vehicles are also somewhat similar to each other. What draws my attention is that we are only 0.5 seconds slower in the 0 to 60 over the Bolt which I find interesting. I'm wondering if the slight difference is because the Bolt has a permanent magnet motor and the rav4 ev has an induction motor which from a tesla blog says that ac induction motors are better for high end performance.
Horse Power to Weight Ratio
RAV4 EV: 0.0382
Bolt: 0.0559
452 Lb is (452÷(4032÷100=40.32)=11.21031746) <- sorry if my math is wrong!
11.21031746% Weight reduction for the Rav4 EV, so a little over 10% weight reduction. If we were to apply the % directly it would reduce the Rav4 EV's 0 to 60 by 0.7847 seconds making it do 0 to 60 in 6.2153 seconds. I doubt it would work this way.
Specifically I have two questions:
1. Since the 0 to 60 is only 0.5 in difference could we expect equal or better 0 to 60 performance from the rav4 ev if we REDUCE the weight of the RAV4 EV by 452 Lbs?
2. Does the Bolt have traction issues like the RAV4 EV on same type of road when you floor it? If it does the vehicles would be more evenly match. If it doesn't or not as much as the RAV4 EV, that would mean a suspension adjustment could give us the needed traction for a better 0 to 60?
And if we do both... can we have equal or sub 6 second zero to sixty runs? ?
Dimensions: 180″ L x 72″ W x 66″ H
Weight: 4,032 lb
Horse Power: 115 kW (154 hp)
Torque: 296 N·m (220 ft·lb) Normal 370 N·m (270 ft·lb) Sport
Final drive Ratio: 9.73:1?
Drag Coefficient of 0.3
0 to 60: 5.6 Sec or 7 Sec
Chevrolet Bolt
Dimensions: 164″ L x 70″ W x 63″ H
Weight: 3,580 lbs
Horse Power: 150 kW (200 hp) permanent magnet motor/generator
Torque: 266 lb.ft./360 Nm
Final drive Ratio: 7.05:1
Drag Coefficient of 0.32
0 to 60: 6.5 Sec
Differences?
Rav4 EV is...
Dimensions: 16" Longer x 2" Wider x 3" Taller
Weight: 452 Lbs Heavier
Horse Power: 46 Hp Weaker
Torque: 4 lb.ft./10 Nm Stronger
Final Drive Ratio: 2.68:1 Slower
Drag Coefficient of 0.02 Better
0 to 60: 0.5 Sec Slower
So it looks like the cards are stacked against us, but it would seem the vehicles are also somewhat similar to each other. What draws my attention is that we are only 0.5 seconds slower in the 0 to 60 over the Bolt which I find interesting. I'm wondering if the slight difference is because the Bolt has a permanent magnet motor and the rav4 ev has an induction motor which from a tesla blog says that ac induction motors are better for high end performance.
Horse Power to Weight Ratio
RAV4 EV: 0.0382
Bolt: 0.0559
452 Lb is (452÷(4032÷100=40.32)=11.21031746) <- sorry if my math is wrong!
11.21031746% Weight reduction for the Rav4 EV, so a little over 10% weight reduction. If we were to apply the % directly it would reduce the Rav4 EV's 0 to 60 by 0.7847 seconds making it do 0 to 60 in 6.2153 seconds. I doubt it would work this way.
Specifically I have two questions:
1. Since the 0 to 60 is only 0.5 in difference could we expect equal or better 0 to 60 performance from the rav4 ev if we REDUCE the weight of the RAV4 EV by 452 Lbs?
2. Does the Bolt have traction issues like the RAV4 EV on same type of road when you floor it? If it does the vehicles would be more evenly match. If it doesn't or not as much as the RAV4 EV, that would mean a suspension adjustment could give us the needed traction for a better 0 to 60?
And if we do both... can we have equal or sub 6 second zero to sixty runs? ?